Two teenagers who were found guilty of the murder of British teenager Brianna Ghey have been named, after a judge lifted a ban on reporting their identities.
Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Rathcliffe, both aged 16, were found guilty in December of the “disturbing murder” of Brianna in a “frenzied and ferocious” knife attack on 11 February 2023.
Jenkinson, Brianna’s school friend, was identified only as girl X during their trial last December at Manchester Crown Court.
Ratcliffe, from Leigh, had been identified only as boy Y.
Each had denied murder and blamed the other for the killing, described as “horrific” by detectives.
Media were banned from naming them during the four-week trial because of their ages.
After they were found guilty of murder by the jury, trial judge Mrs Justice Yip ruled the press could name the two at their sentencing hearing following an appeal on behalf of the media by the PA news agency.
Ratcliffe, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and who is non-verbal, and Jenkinson, diagnosed with traits of autism and ADHD, both face a mandatory life sentence when Mrs Justice Yip sentences them later this morning.
Intelligent and “high functioning”, the trial heard the pair had a fascination for violence, torture and murder and a “thirst for killing”.
Neither had been in trouble with police before.
They were discussing Brianna’s murder for weeks, detailed in Jenkinson’s handwritten murder plan and phone messages found by detectives.
Jurors were told it was “difficult to fathom” how the two child defendants could carry out such a disturbing crime.
Jenkinson, while aged 14, downloaded a TOR internet browser app, to watch videos of the torture and murder of real people, in “red rooms” on the “dark web”.
She developed an interest in serial killers, making notes on their methods, and admitted enjoying “dark fantasies” about killing and torture, the pair living in a secret world of warped interests in murder and cruelty, their trial heard.
They drew up a “kill list” of four others they intended to harm, until Brianna had the “misfortune” to be befriended by Jenkinson.
She had been asked to leave her school, Culcheth High, over an incident involving cannabis and joined Brianna’s school, Birchwood High, and quickly became “obsessed” with her.
Brianna had thousands of followers on TikTok, but in reality was a withdrawn, shy and anxious teenager who struggled with depression and rarely left her home.
Brianna suffered 28 stab wounds during the attack.
As she lay dying Jenkinson sent a message to her victim’s phone, “Girl, where are you?”, to set up her cover story of Brianna leaving them to go off with another youth.
Seconds later she deleted a Snapchat conversation with Brianna, showing “cool and calculated” presence of mind.
Both teenagers went home and carried on as if nothing had happened, Jenkinson later posting an online tribute with a photo of her victim, saying: “Brianna was one of the best people I have ever met and such an amazing friend it’s so f****** sickening what got done to her.”
An hour later both were under arrest.
They had been seen by witnesses with Brianna and caught on CCTV and doorbell footage and quickly traced.
Detectives found the murder weapon with Brianna’s blood on the blade in Ratcliffe’s bedroom, along with heavily blood-stained clothing and trainers.
At Jenkinson’s home they found a handwritten note detailing the murder plan and naming Brianna as the victim.
Messages on their phones detailed their fascination with murder, torture and death, plans to kill other children and an earlier attempt to poison Brianna with an overdose.
Detectives believe Brianna was killed because she was vulnerable and accessible, with her death not a hate crime but done for “enjoyment” and a “thirst for killing”.
Each defendant blamed the other and it is not known which one or if both wielded the knife.
Jenkinson claimed while she enjoyed fantasies of killing Brianna she never intended any of it to become reality.
Ratcliffe said he played along or treated it all as a joke and never wanted to harm anyone.
Jurors disagreed.
